<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Auto industry debates safety vs. fuel economy.: An article from: National Underwriter Property &amp; Casualty-Risk &amp; Benefits Management</title>
	<atom:link href="http://auto.du-reviews.com/uncategorized/auto-industry-debates-safety-vs-fuel-economy-an-article-from-national-underwriter-property-casualty-risk-benefits-management.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://auto.du-reviews.com/uncategorized/auto-industry-debates-safety-vs-fuel-economy-an-article-from-national-underwriter-property-casualty-risk-benefits-management.htm</link>
	<description>reviews about autos and auto parts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 13:41:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
</channel>
</rss>
